Article-detailsAdvances in Industrial Engineering and Management
 Article-details | AIEM

2019(Volume 8)
Vol. 8, No. 1 (2019)
2018(Volume 7)
Vol. 7, No. 1 (2018)
Vol. 7, No. 2 (2018)
2017(Volume 6)
Vol. 6, No. 2 (2017)
Vol. 6, No. 1 (2017)
2016(Volume 5)
Vol. 5, No. 2 (2016)
Vol. 5, No. 1 (2016)
2015(Volume 4)
Vol. 4, No. 2 (2015)
Vol. 4, No. 1 (2015)
2014(Volume 3)
Vol.3, No.4 ( 2014 )
Vol.3, No.3 ( 2014 )
Vol.3, No.2 ( 2014 )
Vol.3, No.1 ( 2014 )
2013 ( Volume 2 )
Vol.2, No.2 ( 2013 )
Vol.2, No.1 ( 2013 )
2012 ( Volume 1 )
Vol. 1, No.1 ( 2012 )



ISSN:2222-7059 (Print);EISSN: 2222-7067 (Online)
Copyright © 2000- American Scientific Publishers. All Rights Reserved.

Title : The Process Model for Shop Floor Management Implementation
Author(s) : Nico Hanenkamp
Author affiliation :
Corresponding author img Corresponding author at : Corresponding author img  

During the early 1990s, the Toyota Production System (TPS) became widely accepted across the industrialized world. Companies from different industries gained in experience by applying lean principles as well as by developing and refining customized approaches to optimize products and processes. From a practical standpoint, the implementation of TPS-elements such as one-piece-flow, visual standards or U-shaped layouts, can easily be identified on the shop floor. Meanwhile, most of the underlying management processes and structures remain hidden to the outside observer. Closing this major gap is the objective of shop floor management. It provides and formalizes an integrated framework of processes with defined roles, responsibilities and competencies to sustain and improve efficiency. Its fundamental principles include a focus on prevention, frequent high decision making and empowered teams consisting of experts, managers and operators. The objective of this article is to define the scope of shop floor management, to sketch a generic structure in terms of an overall process reference model as well as to detail new and modified sub processes, roles and responsibilities to enhance its implementation.

Key words:Continuous Improvement, Shopfloor Management, Lean Management, Toyota Production System

Cite it:
Nico Hanenkamp,The Process Model for Shop Floor Management Implementation,Advances in Industrial Engineering and Management, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 40-46, 2013

Full Text : PDF(size: 524.65 kB, pp. 40-46, Download times:21358)

DOI : 10.7508/AIEM-V2-N1-40-46

[1] D. Nightingale, June 2009, ‘Principles of Enterprise Systems.’ Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Engineering Systems, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge (MA). pp.15-17,
[2] S.J. Spear, 1999, ‘The Toyota Production System: An Example of Managing Complex Social/Technical Systems. 5 Rules for Designing, Operating, and Improving Activities, Activity-Connections, and Flow-Paths’, Ph.D. Thesis, Boston (MA), Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration.
[3] J.P.Womack, D.T. Jones, 1994, ‘From Lean Production to Lean Enterprise’, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 3, pp. 93-103.
[4] J. Liker, 2004, The Toyota Way: 14 Management Principles from the World's Greatest Manufacturer, McGraw-Hill.
[5] K. Suzaki, 1993, the New Shop Floor Management – Empowering People for Continuous Improvement, the Free Press, New York.
[6] S. Spear, H.K. Bowen, 1999, Decoding the DNA of the Toyota Production System; Harvard Business Review 77, no. 5, pp. 96–106.
[7] R. Peters, 2009, Shopfloor Management, Log_X Verlag, Ludwigsburg, Germany.
[8] Internal document Freudenberg NOK Sealing Technologies, 2012, Plymouth (MI).
[9] E. Scherer, M. Zoelch, April, 1995, ‘Design of Activities in Shop Floor Management: A Holistic Approach to Organisation at Operational Business Levels in Business Process Reengineering Project’, Proceedings of the IFIP WG 5.7 Working Conference, Galway, Ireland, pp.20-21,
[10] B.A. Tezel, L.J. Koskela, P. Tzortzopoulos, 2009, ‘The functions of visual management’, Proceedings of International Research Symposium, Salford, UK, pp.27-28,
[11] D. R. Woods., 2000, ‘An Evidence-Based Strategy for Problem Solving’, Journal of Engineering Education 89, Vol. 4.
[12] M.J. Tyre, S.D. Eppinger & E.M.H. Csizinszky, 1995, ‘Systematic versus Intuitive Problem Solving on the Shop Floor: Does it Matter?,’ Sloan School of Management Working paper No. 3976; Boston/MA.
[13] Effective Problem Solving Practitioners Guide, 2012, Automotive Industry Action Group, Southfield (MI).
[14] J. Michalska, D. Szewieczek, 2007, ‘The 5S Methodology as a Tool for Improving the Organisation’, Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, Vol. 24/2, pp. 211-214.
[15] R. Gapp, R. Fisher, K. Kobayashi, 2008, ‘Implementing 5S within a Japanese Context: an Integrated Management System’, Management Decision, Vol. 46, No. 4, DOI:10.1108/0025174080865067
[16] R.A. Al-Aomar, 2011, ‘Applying 5S Lean Technology: An Infrastructure for Continuous Process Improvement,’ World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 59, pp. 2014-2019.
[17] Toyota Motor Corporation: Toyota Handbook for Change Point Management, 2011, Toyota.
[18] J.V. Kovach, E.A. Cudney, & C.C. Elrod, ‘The Use of Continuous Improvement Techniques: A Survey-Based Study of Current Practices’, International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology, Vol. 3, No. 7, pp. 89-100

Terms and Conditions   Privacy Policy  Copyright©2000- 2014 American Scientific Publishers. All Rights Reserved.