Article-detailsAdvances in Industrial Engineering and Management
 Article-details | AIEM

2019(Volume 8)
Vol. 8, No. 1 (2019)
2018(Volume 7)
Vol. 7, No. 1 (2018)
Vol. 7, No. 2 (2018)
2017(Volume 6)
Vol. 6, No. 2 (2017)
Vol. 6, No. 1 (2017)
2016(Volume 5)
Vol. 5, No. 2 (2016)
Vol. 5, No. 1 (2016)
2015(Volume 4)
Vol. 4, No. 2 (2015)
Vol. 4, No. 1 (2015)
2014(Volume 3)
Vol.3, No.4 ( 2014 )
Vol.3, No.3 ( 2014 )
Vol.3, No.2 ( 2014 )
Vol.3, No.1 ( 2014 )
2013 ( Volume 2 )
Vol.2, No.2 ( 2013 )
Vol.2, No.1 ( 2013 )
2012 ( Volume 1 )
Vol. 1, No.1 ( 2012 )



ISSN:2222-7059 (Print);EISSN: 2222-7067 (Online)
Copyright © 2000- American Scientific Publishers. All Rights Reserved.

Title : Suppliers R&D Subsidies Policies for Product Innovation in Indian Context: An Analysis
Author(s) : Manoj Kumar, Jyoti Raman, Priya Raman
Author affiliation : International Engineering Services, H.No.- 87A, RZI – Block, West Sagarpur
Corresponding author img Corresponding author at : Corresponding author img  

This paper attempts to examine the product innovation by R&D subsidies policies in a supply chain by supplier. This study derives a model for a supplier’s product innovation R&D subsidies policy. The product innovation of supplier can contribute to the long-term competitiveness for the supply chain. For many supply chains, product innovation is a major factor, and it should be considered in the development of strategies for a supplier. In this paper, we study whether there is scope for using R&D subsidies to smooth out obstacles to R&D performance for product innovation and expand the share of R&D to suppliers. To this end we consider a dynamic model with sunken entry costs in which supplier optimal participation strategy is defined in terms of two subsidy thresholds that characterise entry and continuation. A survey result in India is studied whether there is scope for using R&D subsidies to smooth out obstacles to R&D performance for product innovation and expand the share of R&D to suppliers. We are able to compute the subsidy thresholds from the estimates of a dynamic panel data type-2 to bit model for an unbalanced panel of about 3,000 Indian suppliers. The results suggest that extensive R&D subsidies (i.e., subsidies on the extensive margin) are a feasible and efficient tool for expanding the share of R&D for product innovation by suppliers.

Key words:Indian Suppliers, R&D subsidies policies, product innovation, sunk cost, dynamic models

Cite it:
Manoj Kumar, Jyoti Raman, Priya Raman, Suppliers R&D Subsidies Policies for Product Innovation in Indian Context: An Analysis, Advances in Industrial Engineering and Management, Vol.3, No.1, 2014, pp.29-58, DOI: 10.7508/AIEM-V3-N1-29-58.

Full Text : PDF(size: 667.27 kB, pp.29-58, Download times:826)

DOI : 10.7508/AIEM-V3-N1-29-58

[1] Birou, L. M., & Fawcett, S. E. 1994. Supplier involvement in integrated product development — A comparison of US and European practices. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, pp.4−14.
[2] Boutellier, R., & Wagner, S. M. 2003. Sour-cing concepts: Matching product architecture, task interface, supplier competence and supplier relationship In H.Österle & R.Winter Eds.. Business Engineering 2nd ed. pp. 223−248.
[3] Clark, K.B., & Fujimoto, T. 1991. Product development performance: Strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry, Boston, Massachusetts. Harvard Business School Press.
[4] Fredrik, V. C., & Claes, T. 2002. Coordinating customers and proactive suppliers a case study of supplier collaboration in product development. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, pp. 249-261.
[5] Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. 1990.. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, pp.9−30.
[6] Kessler, E., Chakrabatri, A., 1996. Innovation speed: A conceptual model of context, antecedents, and outcome. Academy of Management Review, pp.1143–1191.
[7] Krugman, P., 1979. A Model of Innovation, Technology Transfer, and the World Distribution of Income. The Journal of Political Economy, pp. 253-266.
[8] Liker, J. K., Kamath, R. R., Wasti, S. N., & Nagamachi, M., 1996. Supplier involvement in automotive component design: Are there really large US Japan differences? Research Policy, pp. 59−89.
[9] Littler, D., Leverick, F., & Bruce, M., 1995. Factors affecting the process of collaborative product development: A study of UK manufacturers of information and communication technology products. Journal of Product Innovation Management, pp.3-20.
[10] Littler, D., Leverick, F., & Wilson, D., 1998. Collaboration in new technology based markets. International Journal of Technology Management, pp. 139−159.
[11] Mabert,V. A., Muth, J. F. & Schmenner, R. W., 1992. Collapsing new product development times: Six case studies. Journal of Product Innovation management, pp. 200-212.
[12] Milling, P. M., & Stumpfe, J. 2000. Product and process innovation: a system dynamicsbased analysis of their interdependencies. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Bergen, Norway.
[13] Monczka, R. M., Handfield, R. B., Scannell, T. V., Ragatz, G. L., & Frayer, D. J. 2000. New product developmebnt: Strategies for supplier integration. Milwaukee. WI: ASQ Quality Press.
[14] Park, N., & Oduntan, O. 2010. Distributed Innovation as an enabler of long term customer satisfaction and sustained competitiveness under turbulence. Technology Innovation and Industrial Management TIIM. Conference 2010, Bangkok, Thailand.
[15] Peterson, K. J., Handfield, R. B., & Ragatz, G. L., 2003. A model of supplier integration into new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, pp. 284-299.
[16] Pisano, G. P., 1997. The Development Factory: Unlocking the Potential of Process Innovation. Boston, MA: HBS Press.
[17] Primo, M. A. M., & Amundson, S. D., 2002. An exploratory study of the effects of supplier relationships on new product development outcomes. Journal of Operations Management, pp. 33−52.
[18] Ragatz, G. L., Handfield, R. B., & Petersen, K. J., 2002. Benefits associated with supplier integration into new product development under conditions of technology uncertainty. Journal of Business Research, pp.389–400.
[19] Schrader, S., & Göpfert, J. R., 1997. Task partitioning among manufacturers and suppliers in new product development teams. In H. G. Gemünden, T. Ritter, & A. Walter Eds. Relationships and networks in international markets. pp. 248−268.. Oxford: Pergamon.
[20] Susman, G.I., & Ray, J.M., 1999. Test of a model of organizational contributors for product development team effectiveness. Journal of Engineering Technology Management, pp. 223–245.
[21] Tushman, M., & Philip A., 1986. Techn-ological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments, Administrative Science Quarterly, pp. 439-65.
[22] Ulrich, K. T., 1995. The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Research Policy, pp. 419−440.
[23] VonHippel, E., 1988. The sources of innovation. Newyork, NY: Oxford University Press.
[24] VonHippel, E., 1990. Task partitioning: An innovation process variable. Research Policy, pp. 407−418.
[25] Wagner, S. M., 2010. Supplier traits for bett-er customer firm innovation performance. Industrial Marketing Management . pp. 1139-1149.
[26] Wagner, S. M., & Hoegl, M., 2006. Involving suppliers in product development: Insights from R&D directors and project managers. Industrial Marketing Management, pp. 936−943.
[27] Walpole, R.E., & Myers, R.H. 1978. Probability and Statistics for Engineers and Scientist. New York: Macmillan.
[28] Wasti, S.N., & Liker, J.K., 1997. Risky business or competitive power? Supplier involvement in Japanese product design. Journal of Production and Innovation Management. pp. 337–355.
[29] Wasti, S., & Liker, J., 1999. Collaborating with suppliers in product development: a U.S. and Japan comparative study. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, pp.44-46.

Terms and Conditions   Privacy Policy  Copyright©2000- 2014 American Scientific Publishers. All Rights Reserved.