Article-detailsAdvances in Industrial Engineering and Management
 Article-details | AIEM

2019(Volume 8)
Vol. 8, No. 1 (2019)
2018(Volume 7)
Vol. 7, No. 1 (2018)
Vol. 7, No. 2 (2018)
2017(Volume 6)
Vol. 6, No. 2 (2017)
Vol. 6, No. 1 (2017)
2016(Volume 5)
Vol. 5, No. 2 (2016)
Vol. 5, No. 1 (2016)
2015(Volume 4)
Vol. 4, No. 2 (2015)
Vol. 4, No. 1 (2015)
2014(Volume 3)
Vol.3, No.4 ( 2014 )
Vol.3, No.3 ( 2014 )
Vol.3, No.2 ( 2014 )
Vol.3, No.1 ( 2014 )
2013 ( Volume 2 )
Vol.2, No.2 ( 2013 )
Vol.2, No.1 ( 2013 )
2012 ( Volume 1 )
Vol. 1, No.1 ( 2012 )



ISSN:2222-7059 (Print);EISSN: 2222-7067 (Online)
Copyright © 2000- American Scientific Publishers. All Rights Reserved.

Title : Modelling and Controlling Reliability of a Maintenance System using Casual Loop
Author(s) : Pegah Basirat, Hamed Fazlollahtabar
Author affiliation : 1 Department of Industrial Engineering, Mazandaran University of Science and Technology, Babol, Iran
2 Faculty of Industrial Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
Corresponding author img Corresponding author at : Corresponding author img  

Measuring the reliability of a maintenance system is a crucial issue, in which the system reliability could be one of the essential performance indicators to evaluate whether the system is capable or not. The objective of this study is to develop a novel approach for reliability assessment in a maintenance system. Due to the dynamic nature of this system, the concept of system dynamics is employed to determine and analyze its most critical elements, structural characteristics, relationships and feedbacks with respect to reliability. Therefore, series of casual loop diagrams assisting in better understanding of casual influences of maintenance system are developed. The casual loop diagrams plotted here provide a tool for management to hypothesize the dynamic influencing effectiveness of maintenance management, particularly the impact on reliability indices. Then, cumulative sum control chart (CUSUM) being analyzed as a visual objective to determine performance accuracy is considered. In addition, the ability of the CUSUM schemes to detect important types of changes in the optimal reliability indices are analyzed. As a result, these discussions would help system administrators to have better perception and use quantified indices to configure the reliability index in maintenance systems.

Key words:maintenance; reliability; casual loop; CUSUM

Cite it:
Pegah Basirat, Hamed Fazlollahtabar, Modelling and Controlling Reliability of a Maintenance System using Casual Loop, Advances in Industrial Engineering and Management, Vol.3, No.2, 2014, pp.47-58, doi: 10.7508/AIEM-V3-N2-47-58

Full Text : PDF(size: 753.54 kB, pp.47-58, Download times:2055)

DOI : 10.7508/AIEM-V3-N2-47-58

[1] Hoang Pham, 2003. Handbook of Reliability Engineering. United States of America: Springer.
[2] Toshio Nakagawa, 2005. Maintenance theory of reliability.Verlag London: Springer.
[3] Yong Wanga, Lin Li a, Shuhong Huang b, Qing Chang, 2012. Stochastics and Statistics Reliability and covariance estimation of weighted k-out-of-n multi-state systems. European Journal of Operational Research 221, 138–147.
[4] Snehamoy Chatterjee a, Sukumar Bandopadhyay, (2012). Reliability estimation using a genetic algorithm-based artificial neural network: An application to a load-haul-dump machine. Expert Systems with Applications 39, 10943–10951.
[5] H. Zhenga, Y. Chenga, B. Goub, D. Frankc, A. Bernc, W.E. Muston. 2012. Impact of automatic switches on power distribution system reliability. Electric Power Systems Research 83, 51–57.
[6] Salvatore Distefano a, Francesco Longob, Kishor S. Trivedi. Investigating dynamic reliability and availability through state–space models.Computers and Mathematics with Applications.
[7] P. Beaurepaire a, M.A. Valdebenito b, G.I. Schuëller a, H.A. Jensen. 2012. Reliability-based optimization of maintenance scheduling of mechanical components under fatigue. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 221–222, 24–40.
[8] Mobin Sefidgaran, Mohammad Mirzaie, Ataollah Ebrahimzadeh. 2012. Reliability model of the power transformer with ONAF cooling. Electrical Power and Energy Systems 35, 97–104.
[9] Gabriele Manno, Ferdinando Chiacchio, Lucio Compagno, Diego D’Urso, Natalia Trapani, 2012. MatCarloRe: An integrated FT and Monte Carlo Simulink tool for the reliability assessment of dynamic fault tree. Expert Systems with Applications 39, 10334–10342.
[10] Zhonglai Wang, Hong-Zhong Huang, Yanfeng Li, Yu Pang, Ning-Cong Xiao, 2012. An approach to system reliability analysis with fuzzy random variables. Mechanism and Machine Theory 52, 35–46.
[11] Jorge E. Hurtado, Diego A. Alvarez, 2012. The encounter of interval and probabilistic approaches to structural reliability at the design point. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 225–228, 74–94.
[12] Zhao Xu, Volker Coors, 2012. Combining system dynamics model, GIS and 3D visualization in sustainability assessment of urban residential development. Building and Environment 47, 272-287.
[13] Yelin Xu, Cheng shuang Sun, Miroslaw J. Skibniewski, Albert P.C. Chan e, John F.Y. Yeung f, Hu Cheng, 2012. System Dynamics (SD) -based concession pricing model for PPP highway projects. International Journal of Project Management 30, 240–251.
[14] LI Chen, ZHOU Lisha, LI Na, ZENG Ming, 2012. Modelling and Simulation of Power Grid Engineering Project based on System Dynamics on the Background of Smart Grid. Systems Engineering Procedia 3, 92–99.
[15] Yang Miang Goh, Peter E.D. Love, Greg Stagbouer, Chris Annesley, 2012. Dynamics of safety performance and culture: A group model building approach. Accident Analysis and Prevention 48, 118–125.
[16] Olha Bodnar, Wolfgang Schmid. 2011. CUSUM charts for monitoring the mean of a multivariate Gaussian process. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 141, 2055–2070.
[17] SHING I. CHANG, THOMAS R. SAMUEL, 1998. A CONTROL POINT METHODOLOGY FOR CUSUM CONTROL CHARTS. Computers ind. Engng Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 565–572.
[18] Vera do Carmo C. de Vargas, Luis Felipe Dias Lopes, Adriano Mendonc¸a Souza, 2004. Comparative study of the performance of the CuSum and EWMA control charts. Computers & Industrial Engineering 46, 707–724.
[19] Matti Pastell, Henrik Madsen. 2008. Application of CUSUM charts to detect lameness in a milking robot. Expert Systems with Applications 35, 2032–2040.
[20] Ran Tao, Chi-Ming Tam, 2012. System reliability optimization model for construction projects via system reliability theory. Automation in Construction 22, 340–347.
[21] Allan RN, Dialynas EN, Homer IR, 1979. Modeling and evaluating the reliability of distribution systems. IEEE Trans PAS 98, 2181–9.
[22] Gu Yingkuia, Li Jing, 2012. Multi-State System Reliability: A New and Systematic Review. Procedia Engineering 29, 531–536.
[23] GONG Qia, ZHANG Jianguoa, TAN Chunlinb, WANG Cancana. 2012. Neural Networks Combined with Importance Sampling Techniques for Reliability Evaluation of Explosive Initiating Device. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 25, 208–215.
[24] Marco Macchi, Marco Garetti, Domenico Centrone, Luca Fumagalli, Gian Piero Pavirani, 2012. Maintenance management of railway infrastructures based on reliability analysis. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 104, 71–83.
[25] Ching-Fang Lee, Chien-Ping Chung, 2012. An Inventory Model for Deteriorating Items in a Supply Chain with System Dynamics Analysis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 40, 41–51.
[26] Zhang Wu, Mei Yanga, Wei Jiang, Michael Khoo. 2008. Optimization designs of the combined Shewhart-CUSUM control charts. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 53, 496–506.
[27] Saddam Akber Abbasi, Muhammad Riaz, Arden Miller, 2012. Enhancing the performance of CUSUM scale chart. Computers & Industrial Engineering 63, 400–409.

Terms and Conditions   Privacy Policy  Copyright©2000- 2014 American Scientific Publishers. All Rights Reserved.