Article-detailsAdvances in Industrial Engineering and Management
 Article-details | AIEM

2019(Volume 8)
Vol. 8, No. 1 (2019)
2018(Volume 7)
Vol. 7, No. 1 (2018)
Vol. 7, No. 2 (2018)
2017(Volume 6)
Vol. 6, No. 2 (2017)
Vol. 6, No. 1 (2017)
2016(Volume 5)
Vol. 5, No. 2 (2016)
Vol. 5, No. 1 (2016)
2015(Volume 4)
Vol. 4, No. 2 (2015)
Vol. 4, No. 1 (2015)
2014(Volume 3)
Vol.3, No.4 ( 2014 )
Vol.3, No.3 ( 2014 )
Vol.3, No.2 ( 2014 )
Vol.3, No.1 ( 2014 )
2013 ( Volume 2 )
Vol.2, No.2 ( 2013 )
Vol.2, No.1 ( 2013 )
2012 ( Volume 1 )
Vol. 1, No.1 ( 2012 )



ISSN:2222-7059 (Print);EISSN: 2222-7067 (Online)
Copyright © 2000- American Scientific Publishers. All Rights Reserved.

Title : A Quantitative Model of Supply Chain Innovativeness as a Disruption Management Strategy in the Textile Industry
Author(s) : Shaheen Sardara, Young Hae Lee
Author affiliation : Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Hanyang University, South Korea
Corresponding author img Corresponding author at : Corresponding author img  

Supply chain innovativeness (SCI) is the tendency of supply chain network towards non-stop creation and adoption of innovations. This tendency has a direct effect on both predictable and unpredictable disruptions. To manage these disruptions, resilient companies utilize innovativeness as a strategic tool. In contrast, failure to understand the market impact of innovation causes the companies to ignore innovativeness as compared with routine objectives of supply chain management (SCM). Key objective of this research is to propose a quantitative model to measure and evaluate SCI as a disruption management strategy in the global outsourcing environment. The model is based on three steps (a) identification of eleven dimensions of SCI, (b) integration of factors within each dimension and development of quantitative model, and (c) recognition of SCI as a disruption management strategy. The model results show that the innovative supply chains have flexibility to defend disruptions and ability to return to original shape even after severe disruptions. In contrast, non-innovative supply chain networks easily deform in the presence of supply chain disruptions. The combined effect of these eleven dimensions of SCI has a direct connection with both predictable and unpredictable disruptions. This model is used to analyze the textile industry but it could be adopted in other types of supply chain research after related adjustments.

Key words:Quantitative model; supply chain innovativeness; disruptions; outsourcing; textile industry

Cite it:
Shaheen Sardar, Young Hae Lee, A Quantitative Model of Supply Chain Innovativeness as a Disruption Management Strategy in the Textile Industry, Advances in Industrial Engineering and Management, vol. 4, no. 1, 2015, pp. 9-28, doi: 10.7508/aiem.2015.01.002

Full Text : PDF(size: 787.93 kB, pp. 9-28, Download times:667)

DOI : 10.7508/aiem.2015.01.002

[1] H. J. Hwang and J. Seruga, 2011. An intelligent supply chain management system to enhance collaboration in textile industry, International Journal of u-and e-Service, Science and Technology, vol. 4. no. 4, pp. 47-62.
[2] C. Chandra and S. Kumar, 2000. An application of a system analysis methodology to manage logistics in a textile supply chain, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 234-245.
[3] A. Rajput and A. H. A Bakar, 2011. A recapitulation of supply chain management (SCM) in conjunction with textile industry, International Journal of Information, Business and Management, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 39-54.
[4] W. D. Cooper, 2013. A fresh look at the US/Chinese textile and apparel supply chain question, Journal of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1-16.
[5] H. Al-Zubaidi and D. Tyler, 2004. A simulation model of quick response replenishment of seasonal clothing, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 320-327.
[6] P. G. Charkha and S. B. Jaju, 2014. Designing innovative framework for supply chain performance measurement in textile industry, International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 216-230.
[7] T. C. Kuo, C. W. Hsu, S. H. Huang, and D. C. Gong, 2014. Data sharing: a collaborative model for a green textile/clothing supply chain, International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 266-280.
[8] S. Sardar and Y. H. Lee, 2014. Analysis of product complexity considering disruption cost in fast fashion supply chain, Mathematical Problems in Engineering. Article ID 670831, pp. 1-15.
[9] S. Sardar and Y. H. Lee, 2013. Analysis of outsourcing strategies for cost and capacity flexibility in textile supply chain management. In proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Industrial Engineering Theory, Applications and Practice, Pusan National University, Busan, South Korea, pp. 218-225, Oct. 6-9.
[10] R. Vanathi and R. Swamynathan, 2014. Competitive advantage through supply chain collaboration–an empirical study of the Indian textile industry, Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 8-13.
[11] K. L. Lee, Z. M. Udin, and M. G. Hassan, 2014. Global supply chain capabilities in Malaysian textile and apparel industry, International Journal of Supply Chain Management, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 31-40.
[12] R. Rayyaan, Y. Wang, and R. Kennon, 2014. Ontology-based interoperability solutions for textile supply chain, Advances in Manufacturing, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 97-105.
[13] E. W. T. Ngai, S. Peng, P. Alexander, and K. K. Moon, 2014. Decision support and intelligent systems in the textile and apparel supply chain, An academic review of research articles. Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 81-91.
[14] L. De Boer, J. Gaytan, and P. Arroyo, 2006. A satisficing model of outsourcing, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 444-455.
[15] L. M. Ellram, W. L. Tate, and K. J. Petersen, 2013. Offshoring and reshoring: an update on the manufacturing location decision, Journal of Supply Chain Management, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 14-22.
[16] S. Sardar and Y. H. Lee, 2012. Recent researches and future research directions in textile supply chain management, UTCC International Journal of Business and Economics, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 73-120.
[17] B. Louis and G. Tangne, 2010. Impact of outsourcing dynamism on firm’s innovativeness, Dissertation, Halmstad, Sweden, Halmstad University.
[18] E. Lefebvre, L. Cassivi, L. A. Lefebvre, P. M. Leger, and P. Hadaya, 2003. Supply chain management, electronic collaboration tools and organizational innovativeness, Journal on Chain and Network Science, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 81-94.
[19] P. D. Englis, B. G. Englis, M. R. Solomon, and L. Valentine, 2009. Using Knowledge Management to Gain Competitive Advantage in the Textile and Apparel Value Chain: A Comparison of Small and Large Firms, New Technology-Based Firms in the New Millenium, vol. 7, pp. 103-116.
[20] I. Golgeci, S. Y. Ponomarov, 2013. Does firm innovativeness enable effective responses to supply chain disruptions? An empirical study, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 604-617.
[21] B. Antoncic, I. Prodan, R. D. Hisrich, and C. Scarlat, 2007. Technological innovativeness and firm performance in Slovenia and Romania. Post-communist economies, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 281-298.
[22] L. Bengtsson, N. Lakemond, and M. Dabhilkar, 2013. Exploiting supplier innovativeness through knowledge integration, International Journal of Technology Management, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 237-253.
[23] D. M. Ferguson, J. Cawthorne, J. Edwin, B. Ahn, and M. W. Ohland, 2013. Engineering Innovativeness, The Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1-16.
[24] F. Handoko, A. Smith, C. Burvill, 2014. The role of government, universities, and businesses in advancing technology for SMEs’ innovativeness, Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 171-180.
[25] J. H. Hong, D. H. Cho, 2013. What is an Entrepreneur Missing? The Role of Innovation Confidence, International Journal of Control and Automation, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 205-214.
[26] A. Inemek and P. Matthyssens, 2013. The impact of buyer–supplier relationships on supplier innovativeness: An empirical study in cross-border supply networks, Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 580-594.
[27] A. K. Kaushik and Z. Rahman, 2014. Perspectives and Dimensions of Consumer Innovativeness: A Literature Review and Future Agenda, Journal of International Consumer Marketing, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 239-263.
[28] M. R. Millson, 2013. Exploring the moderating influence of product innovativeness on the organizational integration-new product market success relationship, European Journal of Innovation Management, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 317-334.
[29] S. Otieno, H. M. Bwisa, and J. M. Kihoro, 2012. Influence of Entrepreneurial Orientation on Kenya’s Manufacturing Firms Operating under East African Regional Integration, International Journal of Learning and Development, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 299-319.
[30] F. Pallas, F. Bockermann, O. Goetz, and K. Tecklenburg, 2013. Investigating organizational innovativeness: developing a multidimensional formative measure, International journal of innovation management, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 1-41.
[31] M. B. Ayhan, E. Oztemel, M. E. Aydin, and Y. Yue, 2013. A quantitative approach for measuring process innovation: a case study in a manufacturing company, International Journal of Production Research, vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 3463-3475.
[32] A. Subramanian, 1996. Innovativeness: redefining the concept, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 223-243.
[33] R. Srinivasan, G. L. Lilien, and A. Rangaswamy, 1999. The role of technological opportunism in the adoption of radical technologies by firms: an application to E-business, Institute for the Study of Business Markets Report, vol. 26, pp. 32-54.
[34] D. R. Fell, E. N. Hansen, and B. W. Becker, 2003. Measuring innovativeness for the adoption of industrial products, Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 347-353.
[35] J. S. Arlbjorn, H. de Haas, and K. B. Munksgaard, 2011. Exploring supply chain innovation, Logistics Research, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 3-18.
[36] M. Kibbeling, H. der Bij, and A. Weele, 2013. Market Orientation and Innovativeness in Supply Chains: Supplier's Impact on Customer Satisfaction, Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 500-515.
[37] J. S. Ash, D. F. Sittig, R. H. Dykstra, K. Guappone, J. D. Carpenter, and Seshadri, V. 2007. Categorizing the unintended sociotechnical consequences of computerized provider order entry, International Journal of Medical Informatics, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 21-27.
[38] M. Rogers, 1998. The definition and measurement of innovation, Parkville, VIC: Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research.
[39] S. R. Das and M. P. Joshi, 2007. Process innovativeness in technology services organizations: Roles of differentiation strategy, operational autonomy and risk-taking propensity, Journal of Operations Management, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 643-660.
[40] M. J. Ruiz-Ortega, G. Parra-Requena, J. Rodrigo-Alarcon, and P. M. García-Villaverde, 2013. Environmental dynamism and entrepreneurial orientation: The moderating role of firm's capabilities, Journal of Organizational Change Management, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 475-493.
[41] D. J. Flint, E. Larsson, B. Gammelgaard, and J. T. Mentzer, 2005. Logistics Innovation: A customer value‐oriented social process, Journal of business logistics, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 113-147.
[42] A. Bagaria 2014. Uniqlo vs Zara vs H&M vs the world of fashion retailing, Accessed 26 November 2014.
[43] M. Somaiya, 2012. Fashion Forward-Zara’s Supply Chain Strategies, Accessed 5 June 2014.
[44] J. A. Van Mieghem, 2008. Operations Strategy: Principles and Practice, Dynamic Ideas, Belmont, MA.
[45] Zara, Fast-fashion, Optimization and the OM Triangle, 2013. Competitive Advantage via Quantitative Methods, Accessed 19 August 2014.
[46] Zara’s Business Model, Information and Communication Technologies, and Competitive Analysis, 2011. Accessed 12 July 2014.
[47] T. M. Choi, 2013. Fast fashion systems: theories and applications, CRC Press.
[48] V. Amendolagine, R. Capolupo, and G. Ferri, 2014. Innovativeness, offshoring and black economy decisions, Evidence from Italian manufacturing firms, International Business Review, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 1153-1166.

Terms and Conditions   Privacy Policy  Copyright©2000- 2014 American Scientific Publishers. All Rights Reserved.