Article-detailsAdvances in Industrial Engineering and Management
 Article-details | AIEM

2019(Volume 8)
Vol. 8, No. 1 (2019)
2018(Volume 7)
Vol. 7, No. 1 (2018)
Vol. 7, No. 2 (2018)
2017(Volume 6)
Vol. 6, No. 2 (2017)
Vol. 6, No. 1 (2017)
2016(Volume 5)
Vol. 5, No. 2 (2016)
Vol. 5, No. 1 (2016)
2015(Volume 4)
Vol. 4, No. 2 (2015)
Vol. 4, No. 1 (2015)
2014(Volume 3)
Vol.3, No.4 ( 2014 )
Vol.3, No.3 ( 2014 )
Vol.3, No.2 ( 2014 )
Vol.3, No.1 ( 2014 )
2013 ( Volume 2 )
Vol.2, No.2 ( 2013 )
Vol.2, No.1 ( 2013 )
2012 ( Volume 1 )
Vol. 1, No.1 ( 2012 )



ISSN:2222-7059 (Print);EISSN: 2222-7067 (Online)
Copyright © 2000- American Scientific Publishers. All Rights Reserved.

Title : On the Correlation between Centrality Measures and Peer Review: Case of Abrar University
Author(s) : Mehrdad Agha Mohammad Ali Kermani, Alireza Aliahmadi, Atefeh Ghadimi, Maryam Shirvani
Author affiliation : Department of Industrial Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
Department of Industrial Engineering, Abrar University, Tehran, Iran
Corresponding author img Corresponding author at : Corresponding author img  

One of the most important problems that developing countries are involving is education development. Learning management as one problem in education development has some familiar problems such as one of the problems in finding best location for educational sites or tuning the relationship between teachers and students. One of the most important problems in this area is student evaluation in schools and universities. There are two well-known strategies in the world, the first one is named as Teacher based and the second one is named as Student based (peer evaluation). This paper is dealing with this issue that whether the students based strategy is fair or not. To do this, this paper is trying to analyze the students’ centralities and obtained grades based on two above mentioned strategies. Our findings supported that obtained grades through peer evaluation strategy was significantly positively correlated with the some centrality measures. All of data have been gathered in some courses in Abrar University in 2013-2014 academic year.

Key words:Social network analysis; student evaluation; centrality measures; grading, case study

Cite it:
Mehrdad Agha Mohammad Ali Kermani, Alireza Aliahmadi, Atefeh Ghadimi, Maryam Shirvani, On the Correlation between Centrality Measures and Peer Review: Case of Abrar University, Advances in Industrial Engineering and Management, vol. 4, no. 2, 2015, pp. 117-122, doi: 10.7508/aiem.2015.02.002

Full Text : PDF(size: 471.76 kB, pp. 117-122, Download times:944)

DOI : 10.7508/aiem.2015.02.002

[1] S. Boccaletti, V. Latora, Y. Moreno, M. Chavez, and D. U. Hwang, 2006. Complex networks: Structure and dynamics. Physics reports, vol. 424, no. 4, pp. 175-308.
[2] J. D. Montgomery, 1991. Social networks and labor-market outcomes: Toward an economic analysis. The American economic review, pp. 1408-1418.
[3] N. Eagle, A. S. Pentland, and D. Lazer, 2009. Inferring friendship network structure by using mobile phone data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 106, no.36, pp. 15274-15278.
[4] M. Kermani, A. Karimimajd, N. Mohammadi, and B. Aliahmadi B, 2014. A note on predicting how people interact in attributed social networks. International Journal of Current Life Sciences (IJCLS), vol. 4, no. 5.
[5] Knoke D, 1994. Political networks: the structural perspective: Cambridge University Press.
[6] N. M. Tichy, M. L. Tushman, and C. Fombrun, 1979. Social network analysis for organizations. Academy of management review, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 507-519.
[7] S. P. Borgatti and X. Li, 2009. On Social Network Analysis in a Supply Chain Context. Journal of Supply Chain Management, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 15-22.
[8] A. Banerjee, A. G. Chandrasekhar, E. Duflo, and M. O. Jackson, 2013. The diffusion of microfinance. Science, vol. 341, no. 6144.
[9] D. Kempe, J. Kleinberg, É Tardos, and editors, 2003. Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. Proceedings of the ninth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, ACM.
[10] L. C. Freeman, 1979. Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social networks, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 215-239.
[11] H. Zargari, N. Janani, B. Sami, R. Azarvand, D. Pilevar, and E. Feyz, et al., 2011. An experimental study on mobile social network centrality and educational performance. 5th International Conference on Application of Information and Communication Technologies (AICT), 12-14, Oct. 2011, Baku IEEE.
[12] E. S. Orr, M. Sisic, C. Ross, M. G. Simmering, J. M. Arseneault, and R. R. Orr, 2009. The influence of shyness on the use of Facebook in an undergraduate sample. CyberPsychology & Behavior, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 337-340.
[13] Y. Imamverdiyev, H. Z. Asl, F. Khalili, N. Janani, F. Afraz, B. Sami, et al. Finding relationship between intelligence and social centralities in undergraduate students.
[14] R. Aguliyev, Y. Imamverdiyev, H. Zargari, S. Bairami, and editors, 2010. Relationship between Mobile Switching Center Information and Social Behavior in Week Days and Holidays in a Telecommunication Area. ICDS.
[15] T. W. Farmer and P. C. Rodkin. Antisocial and prosocial correlates of classroom social positions: The social network centrality perspective. Social Development. vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 174-88.
[16] M. O. Jackson MO, 2010. Social and economic networks: Princeton University Press.

Terms and Conditions   Privacy Policy  Copyright©2000- 2014 American Scientific Publishers. All Rights Reserved.